If you do not find an answer to your question below, click here to contact us.
The lawsuit that is being settled is entitled Bernadette Dominique v. Desert Financial Credit Union in the Superior Court of the State Of Arizona for the County Of Maricopa, Case No. CV2020-053959. The case is a putative “class action.” That means that the “Named Plaintiff,” Bernadette Dominique, is an individual seeking to act on behalf of members of Desert Financial Credit Union.
The Named Plaintiff claims Desert Financial Credit Union incorrectly charged overdraft fees between June 1, 2014 and November 1, 2017 on non-PIN debit card transactions that authorized against a sufficient available balance and settled against an insufficient available balance. Desert Financial Credit Union disputes these allegations and responds that its overdraft fees were charged as permitted by its terms and conditions and applicable law.
In any lawsuit, there are risks that come with proceeding to trial versus settling at an earlier stage. It is the Named Plaintiff’s lawyers’ job to identify when a proposed settlement offer is good enough that it justifies recommending settling the case instead of continuing to trial. In a class action, these lawyers, known as Class Counsel, make this recommendation to the Named Plaintiff. The Named Plaintiff has the duty to act in the best interests of the putative class as a whole and, in this case, it is her belief, as well as Class Counsel’s opinion, that this settlement is in the best interest of all members of the proposed Settlement Class for at least the following reasons:
There is legal uncertainty about whether a judge or a jury will find that Desert Financial Credit Union incorrectly charged overdraft fees between June 1, 2014 and November 1, 2017 on non-PIN debit card transactions that authorized against a sufficient available balance and settled against an insufficient available balance, and, even if it does, there is uncertainty about whether the claims are subject to other defenses that might result in no or less recovery to members of the proposed Settlement Class. Even if the Named Plaintiff were to win at trial, there is no assurance that members of the proposed Settlement Class would be awarded more than the current settlement amount, and it may take years of litigation before any payments would be made. By settling, members of the proposed Settlement Class will avoid these and other risks and the delays associated with continued litigation.
While Desert Financial Credit Union disputes the allegations in the lawsuit and denies any liability or wrongdoing, it enters into the settlement solely to avoid the expense, inconvenience, and distraction of further proceedings in the litigation.
The deadline for sending a letter to exclude yourself from, or opt out of, the settlement is July 14, 2023.
The deadline to file an objection with the Court is August 18, 2023.
If you do not like the settlement and you believe that you could receive more money by pursuing your claims on your own (with or without an attorney that you could hire) and you are comfortable with the risk that you might lose your case or get less than you would in this settlement, then you may want to consider opting out.
If you believe the settlement is unreasonable, unfair, or inadequate and the Court should reject the settlement, then you can object to the settlement terms. The Court will decide if your objection is valid. If the Court agrees, then the settlement will not be approved and no payments will be made to you or any other member of the Settlement Class. If your objection (and any other objection) is overruled, and the settlement is approved, then you will still get a payment.
If you want to participate in the settlement, you need not do anything and you will receive a payment if you do not opt out.
If you do not want to receive a payment, or if you want to keep any right you may have to sue Desert Financial Credit Union for the claims alleged in this lawsuit, then you must exclude yourself or “opt out.”
To opt out, you must send a letter to the Claims Administrator that you want to be excluded. Your letter can simply say “I hereby elect to be excluded from the settlement in the Bernadette Dominique v. Desert Financial Credit Union class action.” Be sure to include your name, last four digits of your account number, address, telephone number, and email address. Your exclusion or opt-out request must be postmarked by July 14, 2023 and sent to:
Dominique v. Desert Financial Credit Union
c/o Kroll Settlement Administration
PO Box 225391
New York, NY 10150-5391
You can object to the settlement or any part of it that you do not like IF you do not exclude yourself or opt out from the settlement. (Members of the Settlement Class who exclude themselves from the settlement have no right to object to how other members are treated.) To object, you must send a written document to the Claims Administrator at the address below. Your objection should say that you are a member of the Settlement Class, that you object to the settlement, and the factual and legal reasons why you object, and whether you intend to appear at the hearing. In your objection, you must include your name, address, telephone number, email address (if applicable) and your signature.
All objections must be post-marked no later than August 18, 2023, and must be mailed to the Claims Administrator as follows:
CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR |
Dominique v. Desert Financial Credit Union c/o Kroll Settlement Administration PO Box 225391 New York, NY 10150-5391 |
The Court will be asked to approve the amount of attorneys’ fees at the Fairness Hearing. Class Counsel will file an application for fees and costs and will specify the amount being sought as discussed above. You may review the fee application here or view a physical copy at the Office of the Clerk for the Superior Court Of The State Of Arizona For The County Of Maricopa.